MARCH 2021 Newsletter
The Hard Work of Collaboration
…and how it can be a first step toward a better service delivery system
STORY OF GREATER HOUSTON COLLABORATIVE FOR CHILDREN
Not Just Another Meeting…
In 1996 many of the major foundations in Houston began meeting to dialogue around the concept of collaboration. Dr. Maconda Brown O’Connor, Board Chair of the Brown Foundation, and Dr. Charles Bonjean, Executive Director of the Hogg Foundation for Mental Health initiated the conversation. They brainstormed and built on what was supposed to be a committee to plan an annual conference on mental health into what ultimately became a plan to launch the Greater Houston Collaborative for Children! Dr. O’Connor was not interested in planning another meeting where people came and then went home accomplishing very little. She wanted to be part of planning something that would last to positively impact children in Houston. Dr. Michele Sabino, a Grant Officer with The Houston Endowment, was inspired by the concept of collaboration and became a strong advocate and facilitator of the effort. Three other foundations that were also around the table were the Cockrell Foundation, the Greater Houston Community Foundation (who served as fiscal agent for the collaboration) and the Powell Foundation.
As the group was meeting to discuss the purpose of the collaboration, Nancy Powell Moore, of the Powell Foundation, mentioned that she had seen a recent segment of Diane Sawyer’s Prime-Time Live show on the topic of early brain development. On the program, Sawyer stressed “the importance of pathways for learning laid down at an early age, that, if not developed at the appropriate time, their potential was lost.” The news segment also emphasized that “loving interaction between parents and children change a child’s brain chemistry and gets the child ready to learn.”[ 1 ] Out of these conversations about collaboration and the growing awareness of the life-changing impact of meaningful interactions between adults and young children, a decision was made to test the concept of collaboration to improve early education in Houston. After many meetings and a great deal of research and data gathering, the Greater Houston Collaborative for Children (GHCC) was born.
The initial focus of GHCC was to provide multi-year financial support to two significant collaborations, selected through a competitive request for proposal (RFP) process. The Bridge/El Puente, led by Neighborhood Centers (NCI, now BakerRipley), brought together a range of engaged, committed community partners to provide family support services. NCI was also able to build on their existing programs for newly arrived immigrant families living in the Gulfton area. The second collaboration, Family-Centered Child Care Collaborative (FCCCC), was led by Initiatives for Children (IFC) with a goal of strengthening the ability of childcare centers to meet the growing needs of families affiliated with their programs.
The foundations created an Executive Council to provide oversight to the projects and to learn about the benefits and barriers to collaboration. The funders functioned as a collaboration as well, pooling their resources and making major decisions as a group. The Executive Directors of both of the lead agencies were members of the Council which was and still is unusual but at the time was tremendously helpful -- giving funders direct information on the benefits and challenges associated with collaboration. Lastly, two well-known representatives of the health and human services community, Dr. Peggy Smith, Professor, Baylor College of Medicine, Teen Health Clinic, and Regenia Hicks, Harris County Mental Health, were also invited to serve on the Executive Council. A formal evaluation through the University of Houston produced annual reports that focused on the impact of collaborative service delivery as well as the collaborative process.
At the end of the five-year experiment, NCI took on the management and fundraising for The Bridge/El Puente which, through their appreciative inquiry process, led to the creation of a beautiful community center that provides a range of services for the Gulfton and Sharpstown neighborhoods. In 2004, GHCC and IFC merged to form Collaborative for Children, which continues to serve families with young children and improve the quality of childcare in the Greater Houston area.
So, did the collaboration process work? What was accomplished as a result of the effort? What are the critical components of collaboration that need to be nurtured in order for it to succeed? What are the challenges of collaboration? Let’s take these one at a time.
Did IT WORK?
ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF COLLABORATION
While the two collaborations yielded many lessons learned about how to manage collaborations, most importantly, they provided a stimulus for future decisions that led to stronger service delivery systems for families in Houston. With respect to The Bridge/El Puente, families living in the Gulfton area now have a beautiful multi-service center operated by BakerRipley which offers an array of services including Head Start, after school programs, ESL, immigration services, citizenship classes, computer literacy classes, a food bank, a community garden, and GED classes. The Greater Houston Collaborative for Children brought two organizations with similar missions and offering complementary services under one roof. The Collaborative for Children has grown to provide a more comprehensive array of services with the goals of improving the quality of early education programs and supporting and strengthening families with young children.
A Few of the Key Lessons Learned:
Shared power and responsibility between funders and service providers enabled a rare dialogue and a better understanding of each other’s role.
Building trust and keeping the lines of communication open among partners (both funders and service providers) was key when tough decisions were required.
Diversity of partners contributed to a better understanding the needs of families served.
Flexibility, when things didn’t go as planned, and openness to considering a different approach, were critical.
Managing and supporting a collaboration takes significant time and resources over and above an organization’s normal budget.
It’s important to stay focused on the main goal – to improve the service delivery system for clients.
NECESSARY COMPONENTS FOR COLLABORATION:
assess your collaboration
In general, collaborations are more successful if partners can answer “yes” to most of these questions:
Has a community challenge or opportunity been identified that would be better addressed through a coordinated, multi-faceted approach?
Is a formal collaboration the best way to address a clearly identified issue?
Is there a clear vision for the collaboration (a picture of what the community will look like when the collaboration is successful)?
Are the leaders of each of the partner organizations willing to actively participate in meetings to develop a plan on how to best address the identified issue?
Is there agreement on how meetings will be coordinated and facilitated so that partner leaders can focus on addressing the content of the meeting agendas?
Is there a willingness to put organizational egos and recognition aside to focus on the best way to solve the problem (or address the opportunity)?
Are partners willing to be flexible and consider changing their approach to service delivery to enhance overall service delivery for clients?
Is there an upfront commitment to evaluating the process, the progress and the outcomes of the collaboration?
CHALLENGES OF COLLABORATION:
Impacts, Issues, and Solutions
ISSUE:
Given the impact of COVID-19 and the resulting impact on the economy, nonprofit organizations are struggling with raising resources at a time when the demand for their services may be increasing. This situation may result in collaboration partners feeling as though they are in competition with a collaboration’s request for funding from the same funder sources.
Potential Solution:
Initiate honest, open conversation between partners and funders about this issue early in the collaborative process to explore funding strategies so that collaboration development is supported for a defined period of time while continuing to support partner organizations.
ISSUE:
Nonprofit organizations participating in a collaboration may be at different levels of understanding of (1) the root causes of the challenges being addressed, (2) existing approaches to addressing the problem, and (3) the effectiveness of various strategies.
Potential Solution:
Carefully listen to those with significant experience in addressing this issue so that all partners have a better appreciation of root causes of problems and the historical structural or funding issues that hamper solutions, while being open to fresh ideas and approaches from those newer to the issue!
ISSUE:
The creation of a collaboration to address an issue may be viewed as an outcome rather than the structure to effectively address a challenging issue. Collaborations that don’t define and implement tangible actions to address an issue and measure progress toward achieving the specific outcomes lead to frustrated partners and dwindling participation.
Possible Solution:
Develop time-limited Memorandums of Understanding that are signed by each of the partners. The MOUs should describe their roles and responsibilities and state the potential benefits and overall goals of the collaboration. This helps to hold partners accountable to one another and keep them focused on the job at hand.
ISSUE:
Collaborations represent opportunity costs. They require significant time from organization leaders which needs to be justifiable to each of the organization’s boards and staff leadership. Is the time spent on the collaboration generating tangible benefits in problems solved or service delivery systems improved that make it worthwhile?
Response:
In addition to the Memorandums of Understanding described above, commit to periodically asking the big questions – Are we making tangible progress toward the vision of the collaboration?
summary
Collaboration can be exciting and provide a sense of “we are in this together” – enabling groups to accomplish something for their clients, for the community that they could not do on their own. There is a sense of camaraderie and an opportunity to address (and have an impact on) a significant community issue. In some cases, forming a collaboration may not be the best response to addressing a difficult community issue. Maybe what is needed is better coordination or consolidation of community resources. However, if the right conditions exist and the right partners come together with just the right blend of courage and humility, collaboration can lead to positive change that helps communities achieve what they most desire – better outcomes for the people served.
[ 1 ] The three longitudinal studies were the High Scope Perry Preschool Project, the Chicago Child-Parent Center study and the Abecedarian Project.
TWO EXAMPLES OF COLLABORATION:
COVID-Born Collaboration
The Next Education Collaborative (NEC) is a relatively new collaboration focused on strengthening literacy efforts in Houston. It was created as a vehicle for education-focused nonprofit organizations to come together to address the impact COVID was having on education. Participants include Books Between Kids, Collaborative for Children, Literacy Now, Neuhaus Education Center and TEACH. Barriers to learning have been amplified by the pandemic. The death of George Floyd also heightened awareness of racial inequity in our country and contributed to a desire for these organizations to explore working more closely together. The overarching goal of NEC is to positively impact emergent literacy and school readiness for all through teacher and leader development and evidence-based practices.
Since convening for the first-time last spring, the group has worked to: (1) identify gaps in services to families with young children, (2) held listening sessions (United Way Thrive, the Greater Houston Partnership and Harris County Public Library, among others) and (3) learned more about each other’s organizations – what services are currently being offered and how these services can come together in a more comprehensive way to better meet the needs of families. While it is early in the collaboration’s development, a next step is to begin to think about a possible location for a pilot project. First and foremost, members recognize that community input from leaders and families in the neighborhood is very important: How would they describe the early literacy assets and challenges in the neighborhood, and how would a collaboration of education organizations help to improve educational outcomes?
For more information, please contact Dr. Tracy Weeden, President and CEO, Neuhaus Education Center, at TWeeden@neuhaus.org.
Collaboration before it was a “thing”
Collaboration is not a new idea. One of the first collaborations that I was involved with, over 25 years ago, was called Communities Conquering Cancer (CCC). The idea for the collaboration came out of conversations among colleagues in different health care systems, CHI St. Luke’s Health (previously St. Luke’s Episcopal Hospital) and the Kelsey Seybold Clinic. The partnership, which eventually grew to seventeen health care providers, was created to: (1) provide a comprehensive continuum of breast health services for low-income women, (2) build partnerships among Houston’s health and human service institutions to improve quality and maximize resources, and (3) create a model for cost-sharing among partners that reduces barriers to accessing service as well as lowers financial risk for service providers. The limited public resources available for breast cancer screening and treatment at the time meant that low-income women were frequently not diagnosed until cancer had spread, making treatment more challenging and more expensive.
While these two partners saw patients in their Medical Center clinic and hospital, they realized that to get information to women earlier about the importance of regular mammograms and to make them more easily accessible and affordable, they would need to go outside of the Medical Center and into the community. Additional partners were also invited to participate in the conversation including American Cancer Society, Harris County Hospital District, MD Anderson Cancer Center and The Rose, and they worked together to define the purpose of the collaboration and how each partner could contribute to building a more comprehensive continuum of care.
Once it was clear how the collaboration would work -- from raising awareness, screening, diagnosis to treatment – and what partners would provide at each step in the continuum, they identified a neighborhood with limited health care resources in northwest Houston to pilot the newly developed continuum. St. Luke’s provided initial funding and each of the partners signed a Memorandums of Understanding documenting their commitment. Over a four-year period, over 2,300 women benefited from resources through the collaboration, some women returning for their second and third annual screening over that period.
Dorothy Gibbons, the Co-Founder and CEO of The Rose, said “CCC broke open the awareness of terrible gaps in services for the uninsured.” Over the last 25 years, while there have been some improvements in breast health resources for low income, uninsured women, Gibbons says that “there are still major challenges” for this group of women. Below is a summary of some of the improvements and continuing challenges for low income, uninsured women in accessing breast health care:
While CCC revealed this little known and under-reported issue, on balance, there are still significant issues in the accessibility and affordability of breast health care for low- income, uninsured women. Texas has an opportunity to improve this in this coming legislative session. Make your voice heard!
19 FACTORS INFLUENCING SUCCESS
What Makes It Work
(From the Collaboration Handbook, Creating, Sustaining and Enjoying the Journey and Collaboration: What Makes It Work by Paul Mattessich and Barbara Monsey of the Wilder Research Center.)
Factors Related to the ENVIRONMENT
1. History of collaboration or cooperation in the community
2. Collaborative group members seen as leaders in the community
3. Political/social climate favorable
Factors Related to MEMBERSHIP CHARACTERISTICS
4. Mutual respect, understanding, and trust
5. Appropriate cross-section of members
6. Members see collaboration as in their self-interest
7. Ability to compromise
Factors Related to PROCESS/STRUCTURE
8. Members share a stake in both process and outcome
9. Multiple layers of decision making
10. Flexibility
11. Development of clear models and policy guidelines
12. Adaptability
Factors Related to COMMUNICATION
13. Open and frequent communication
14. Established informal and formal communication links
Factors Related to PURPOSE
15. Concrete, attainable goals and objectives
16. Shared vision
17. Unique purpose
Factors Related to RESOURCES
18. Sufficient funds
19. Skilled convener
next issue
The June 2021 newsletter issue will focus on the value and cost-benefit of strategic planning in this rapidly changing environment. The Houston Area Urban League and their recent strategic planning process will be featured.
CONTACT US
Shattuck Consulting partners with the Board and Staff Leadership of nonprofit organizations to strengthen board operations, facilitate strategic planning processes, and assess and strengthen organizational operations. For more information about the services provided by Shattuck Consulting, LLC, please visit us at cshattuckconsulting.com/services.